Live workshops · Law firms & legal departments

AI training for legal teams, grounded in the work lawyers do.

Help your team direct AI effectively, check the substance of its work, and produce drafts they can stand behind. Practice on realistic legal assignments with guided exercises and feedback.

90-minute workshops · Virtual or in person · Options for a focused session or a continuing team program

Choose the skill your team needs next

Three workshops. Three useful outcomes.

Start with reviewing a draft, managing an assignment, or creating a shared team workflow. Each workshop connects AI skills to the judgment, sources, and reader needs that legal work requires.

01 · Review

Is This Ready to Send?
Reviewing AI-Assisted Legal Work

90 minutes · Associates, counsel, partners, and in-house lawyers

A draft can sound convincing while changing a material fact, leaving out a qualification, or failing to help the reader decide. Practice distinguishing clear wording from sound work.

Discuss this review workshop

What your team does

Work from a short source packet and several plausible drafts. Decide what to keep, revise, verify, or remove. Support each material criticism with a source, an unmet reader need, or a reasoning gap, then produce a version you would send.

Practice a review sequence: clarify the assignment and decision; compare claims with sources; examine omissions and uncertainty; test the recommendation; improve structure and style.

Take away: An annotated final draft and a short review guide with examples.

Constructed examples are labeled. The exercise is a starting point: real matters may require additional sources and several review passes.

02 · Direct

From Assignment to Verified Deliverable:
Directing AI on a Legal Matter

90 minutes · Lawyers ready for a repeatable process

Turn a vague request into a defined assignment. Decide what AI should do, what context it needs, and where a lawyer needs to check the work before the final handoff.

Discuss this workflow workshop

What your team does

Clarify the decision, recipient, deadline, sources, and constraints. Plan manageable tasks and intermediate checks, then draft, review, and revise one deliverable.

Partway through, a new instruction or contradictory source changes the assignment. Update the plan and work product while preserving the definitions, exceptions, and purpose each task needs.

Take away: A one-page matter workflow covering inputs, intermediate checks, the final reviewer, unresolved questions, and the deliverable.

03 · Build

Build Your Team’s AI Writing Playbook

90 minutes · Intact practice groups and legal departments
Optional follow-up clinic

Turn individual habits into a workflow colleagues can actually use. Agree on what good work looks like for recurring assignments and write review criteria that hold up under deadline pressure.

Discuss a team playbook

What your team does

Start with two recurring assignments, such as a research update and a contract-risk summary. Compare examples, choose approved models, and develop one complete workflow. Test it on a fresh example with someone who did not design it.

Take away: A working playbook with one complete workflow, annotated examples, permitted inputs, review checks, and a named owner for revisions.

The optional clinic brings the team back after using the workflow to address what practice revealed.

Make the learning last

Start with a workshop. Build from there.

A focused live session

Choose the workshop closest to the work your team needs to improve. Discuss the audience, experience level, and delivery format with us.

A continuing team program

Combine live workshops with practice between sessions and an optional follow-up clinic or individual coaching.

Courses and AI writing tools

Add on-demand AI skills courses, Prompt Pilot, Diagnostics, and the Prompt Library to support practice after training. Access and term are set out in your proposal.

Included for all Write.law users: The AI-Enabled Lawyer

A practical resource for using AI more effectively across legal tasks, collecting more than a decade of Write.law’s proprietary work with leading legal teams around the world.

Explore The AI-Enabled Lawyer →

Your instructor

Legal practice meets the craft of teaching.

Joe Regalia is a law professor, attorney, and co-founder of Write.law. His workshops combine legal writing, practical AI skills, and guided work on realistic assignments.

Joe graduated summa cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School, clerked for the Ninth Circuit, and practiced at AmLaw 100 firms.

View Joe’s background · See clients and partners

Also planning writing training? Explore the full legal writing workshop menu.

Planning your training

Which workshop should we start with?

Choose Review if the immediate concern is checking drafts before they go out. Choose Direct if lawyers need a repeatable process for an assignment. Choose Build if an intact group needs shared standards. We can help you select the starting point.

Can we combine live training with courses and tools?

Yes. We can scope a program that combines workshops, on-demand courses, AI writing tools, and coaching. The proposal will specify the included resources, access period, and delivery format.

How much does team training cost?

Request a custom proposal based on your team size, goals, delivery format, timing, and any follow-up support. Tell us those details so we can recommend an appropriate scope.

What if I am learning on my own?

Explore our legal writing and AI courses and individual plans. All Essential, Plus, and Pro subscriptions include Prompt Pilot, Diagnostics, and the Prompt Library, monthly or annually.

What does your team need to do better?

Tell us about your recurring assignments, team size, AI experience, preferred format, and timing. We will help you choose a workshop or scope a continuing program.

Request a training proposal

A proposal request starts a conversation about your team’s needs.